Today, the Federal Circuit will hear oral argument in Contour IP Holding LLC v. GoPro, Inc., Case Nos. 2022-1654, -1691, once again stepping into complex questions of patentable subject matter ...

The estoppel provision of the American Invents Act (AIA) (35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(2)) prevents a petitioner in an inter parties review (IPR) proceeding from later raising before the Patent Office, a ...

“Contour IP Holding v. GoPro is a valuable tool in the continuing development of patent subject matter eligibility. It stands as a counterbalance to a series of post-Alice decisions that invalidated ...

I've been an action camera buyer for a long time. Remember the GoPro vs Contour wars of the early 2010s? I was there, in the trenches and on the slopes, backing the more aerodynamic but shorter-lived ...

“While GoPro argued the claims ‘simply employ known or conventional components that existed in the prior art at the time of the invention,’ the CAFC said, even if true, ‘that alone does not ...

GoPro had made five patent claims against Insta360, and the US International Trade Commission sided with Insta360 on every ...